From Max Weber to Public Sociology
نویسندگان
چکیده
Growing up in a political as well as an intellectual environment, Max Weber not only sought to comprehend the world but also to change it. Arguably, he took Karl Marx’s 11th. Thesis on Feuerbach that “philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it,” far more seriously than its author. Marx, after all, did not reflect, in any systematic fashion, on the place of intellectuals and their ideas in history. Equally, Emile Durkheim – perhaps because he saw sociology as a deeply moral science, devoted to deriving what ought to be from what is – did not seriously concern himself with political engagement. Among these three founding figures of sociology, it was only Weber, who paid sustained attention to science and politics both in his life and in his writing. He strove to fathom the relation between sociology of society and sociology in society, between theory and practice. Although the notion of public sociology was absent from his conceptual armory, of the three Weber offers the greatest contribution, albeit indirectly, to the meaning, challenges and possibilities of public sociology. In, thus, filling out Weber’s reflexive sociology with the notion of public sociology, I show the continuing relevance of his framework for the problems facing sociology and society today.
منابع مشابه
Simmel and Weber as ideal- typical founders of sociology
Max Weber and Georg Simmel are considered as ideal-typical founders of sociology. Whereas Simmel pleaded for a large conception of sociology, which would include the epistemological and metaphysical issues as well, Max Weber explicitly excluded philosophical questions from the domain of sociology. A philosophical reading of Max Weber’s sociology, which uncovers his philosophy in the margins of ...
متن کاملThe classical theories of sociology, that is, of Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, were both m
The classical theories of sociology, that is, of Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, were both monumental and flawed. Their main weakness lies in the weaknesses inherent in sociology: it is vague, unscientific, and reductive. [Hmmmm. Would you want to shout this out in Social Science? on what grounds do you make such charges?] However, although their analyses of religion built from this flawed social...
متن کاملMax Weber and Jürgen Habermas: The Sociology and Philosophy of Law During Crises of the State
متن کامل
Paths of the Weberian–Austrian Interconnection
This paper centers on the theoretical–methodological interconnections between Weber and the Austrian economists. First, the influence of classical Austrian economics, especially Menger and Böhm-Bawerk, on Weber is reexamined. Then we are concerned with the importance of Weber’s ideas in neoclassical Austrian economics, including Schumpeter, Mises and Hayek. Also, Weber’s legacy in modern econom...
متن کاملA Sociological Study of the Culture of Development in Hawrami Proverbs
The present study investigates the culture of development in Hawrami proverbs. Analysis of development-related variables is the basis of sociology. As collective phenomena, proverbs are part of the oral culture of a society and their investigation can sociologically explain cultural and social foundations of the society. This research attempts to specify 6 development-related parameters in Hawr...
متن کامل